By Andy Miofsky, Illinois Consumer Law Attorney
closeAuthor: Andy Miofsky, Illinois Consumer Law Attorney
Name: Andy Miofsky, Illinois Consumer Law Attorney
Email: ndinstl@gmail.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (9) on Aug 18, 2008 in Debt Collector Abuse, Featured | 0 Comments
The Service Members Relief Act [SCRA] is designed to prevent a person in active service to this country from being sued while on duty. Seasoned lawyers remember this law as the Soldier and Sailor’s Relief Act. It has been amended and rewritten over time, and there are many more specific protections but the general gist of the law is that our troops should not have to defend a lawsuit at the same time they are defending our country. Nor should they return home from Iraq and find their home foreclosed.
Some banks do not agree and ignore the protections afforded our military. National Public Radio tells the story of a Michigan family who lost their house to foreclosure while the husband was overseas fighting terrorists in Iraq.
Deutsche Bank and Saxon Mortgage cite several reasons they believe the law doesn’t apply to this case. They say they foreclosed a week and a half before the service member reported for active duty, and they say the sergeant didn’t provide them adequate documents to prove he really was going to Iraq.
Lawyers argue the law provides protection as soon as one receives military orders. They also say the documents this servicemember provided — a copy of his unit’s orders and a note from his captain — are adequate under the law.
The Court might agree. “It looks to me like the bank screwed up badly and needs to make things right,” federal judge Nancy Edmunds said during a February hearing.
Military personnel should contact a lawyer trained in defending debt collection issues. Whether it is foreclosure defense, car repossession, or credit card collection issues, lawyers can use the SCRA to protect our military and their families. It is the patriotic thing to do.
By Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
closeAuthor: Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
Name: Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
Email: steve@sottolaw.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (19) on Aug 17, 2008 in Debt Collection Laws, Debt Collector Abuse, Uncategorized | 0 Comments
Generally, the FDCPA excludes from its provisions:
- Creditors Collecting Their Own Debts, Retail Stores, Banks, Finance Companies - 15 U.S.C. 1692a(6).
- Assignees Before Default, Car Finance Companies, Mortgage Servicing Companies - 15 U.S.C. 1692a(6). Read the rest
By Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
closeAuthor: Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
Name: Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
Email: steve@sottolaw.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (19) on Aug 16, 2008 in Debt Collection Laws, Debt Collector Abuse, Uncategorized | 0 Comments
Generally, the following must abide by the FDCPA when collecting consumer debts:
- Collection Agencies - any person whose principal business is collecting debts and any person who regularly collects debts owed to another (15 U.S.C. Section 1692a(6)).
- Attorneys - any attorney who regularly collects consumer debts owed or due or asserted to be owed or due another (Pub. L. No. 99-361, 100 Stat. 768 (effective July 9, 1986.)) Read the rest
By Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
closeAuthor: Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
Name: Stephen Otto, Pittsburgh Consumer Attorney
Email: steve@sottolaw.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (19) on Aug 15, 2008 in Debt Collection Laws, Debt Collector Abuse, Uncategorized | 0 Comments
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) protects consumers obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt. It also protects “other persons.” Other persons can be employers, creditors, relatives, friends, and neighbors affected by a debt collector’s violation of the FDCPA.
The National Consumer Law Center’s Fair Debt Collection manual cites an excellent example as follows:
“If a collector calls a consumer’s friend, asking him or her to talk to the consumer about a debt, both the consumer and the friend have standing to sue under the provision of the Act prohibiting third-party contacts. On the other hand, if the collector calls the friend late at night, the consumer and friend have standing to sue under the provision of the Act prohibiting third-party contacts, but the friend does not benefit from the protection against late night phone calls because that provision only applies to communication with a consumer. In an egregious case, however, the friend might successfully claim harassment or abuse under the general provisions of 15 U.S.C. Section 1692d or unfair means of collection under 15 U.S.C. Section 1692f. In either example, if the debt collector had treated the friend as allegedly obligated, the friend would come squarely within the definition of “consumer.”"
National Consumer Law Center, Fair Debt Collection, p 109 (5th ed. 2004).
By Andy Miofsky, Illinois Consumer Law Attorney
closeAuthor: Andy Miofsky, Illinois Consumer Law Attorney
Name: Andy Miofsky, Illinois Consumer Law Attorney
Email: ndinstl@gmail.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (9) on Aug 15, 2008 in Debt Collection Laws | 0 Comments
The Fair Debt Collection Practice Act FDCPA regulates collection activity of consumer debt, debt arising out of transactions that are primarily for personal, household or family purposes, 15 U.S.C 1692a5. Business debt and the debt collectors who collect it are not covered by the FDCPA. The lesson herein is that not all debt collectors are alike.
While some collectors and attorneys are prohibited from taking unfair collection tactics, others are not so restrained. And they know it. Often clients call my consumer law office to tell me about harassing and vulgar phone calls, or out of area lawsuits, and ask “Can they do that”? Granted, the vast majority of individual debt is not business related, however, it is important to know the distinction when evaluating a case for possible violation of the FDCPA.